Well, that was meant to nicely segue into a discussion of Black Friday and the Buy Nothing Day movement, but it seems my writing skills are a little rusty, so please excuse my linguistic potholes as I plod on.
What is the symbolism with ugly sweaters anyhow?
I had this personal experience myself. Twice now I have knitted sweaters for people. The first I knit for my now ex husband. I will let you speculate on whether there is a connection there, but I will say that he did wear that sweater, in public (even after the split), for more than a decade. It was not Christmas themed, and the pattern was subtle and the colours well suited to him.
With that "success" under my belt, I knit another for a different relative. I was a little more extravagant, and choose some (very expensive) designer alpaca and silk yarns. They were in pastel shades and were carefully worked so that the different yarns were spun together. The effect was subtle and classy, working well with her hair and skin tones, as well as with other items in her wardrobe. The receiver lost weight over my knitting time, so by the time I gave it to her, it no longer fit. I took it back and reworked it then returned it.
After several months, I asked her if it was working for her, She said she'd donated it to Goodwill. I spent over 100 hours on that, from sourcing the yarn, to knitting and reworking it! I have only knit sweaters for babies since then, since babies haven't found the Goodwill stores yet. That family member has been on the "gift card" list ever since.
Does anyone else see the irony in mass-market ugly sweaters?
Moving along here...
This coming Friday is "Black Friday" in the US. Canada has jumped on that commercialized frenzy over the past few years as well. Lineups, pushing and shoving, fist-fights, all for the sake of getting something at a reduced price that is likely to end up in the landfill in less than 6 months (where I'm sure they will join a few of the items in these images). Not only does such disposable thinking create landfill waste, it also is wasteful in the production stage, and especially in the transportation stage. International shipping is a huge contributor of GHG emissions. This article in the Guardian details the extent of the shipping contributions worldwide http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2008/feb/13/climatechange.pollution If that isn't the scariest Christmas ghost story since Dickens, I don't know what is.
An alternative is to seriously consider the receiver of the gift and give accordingly. What are their needs and interests? Have you asked them directly what they would like? Is there a service that you could provide or pay for that would improve their life in some way? When the gift truly matches the receiver, there is less likelihood of waste.
The holidays are busy, so for some people, a gift that reaches into the future may be welcome, such as tickets to a live theatre or sporting event that matches their interests.
Once the gifts have been determined, I like to consider the environment when wrapping. There are many reusable wrapping options. This link has a few you can make yourself www.llemonade.com/wrap